On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:11:32AM +0200, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Do I understand your hint correctly when I guess that if you invert the > > mid band and add it at the right level the whole thing would end up more > > or less flat? > > Just inverting it will produce a sum response that is more or less > flat. It will have bumps of a few dB instead of the deep dips, but > this can be corrected to some degree by adjusting the filter params. wouldnt a linkwitz-riley fit best here ? i am still a bit confused. i always thought, that a mastering processor should be linear phase. so what came to my mind first, when i saw the comments about the problems in the lower bands, was to just increase the number of FIR taps. we would lower cpu usage also. we would get a considerably higher latency though. fons... do you think a 16384 tap fir could do a decent crossover and EQ ? (assuming this linear phase mumbo jumbo actually makes sense) this is intended for post-proc, so latency is not relevant. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > There are three of them, and Alleline. > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
