Re: Even more netjack trouble (although setup seems as described)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/28/2010 12:30 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
Hello Jörn!
So no matter if he initiates the connection, he will also need the
correct ports forwarded from his router?

UDP is stateless, and there is no concept of "initiating a connection" on the network layer. you basically send a UDP packet and hope it makes it. the opposite end does the same.

so say we have this setup:

machine A: 192.168.0.2/24
router A: internal address 192.168.0.1/24, external address x.x.x.x
internet
router B: internal address 192.168.0.1/24, external address y.y.y.y
machine B: 192.168.0.2/24

router A must listen to the UDP port you want to use and forward each packet to machine A.
router B must listen to the same port and forward to machine B.


say you're A. your partner host will then be y.y.y.y, i.e. the router. since it's forwarding, you will be in effect talking to machine B.
same rules apply for the other direction.

it's advisable to run a testing tool for udp connections before you try netjack. i recommend iperf, it's text-mode and available at sourceforge iirc.




_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux