Re: No batch processing on Linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, September 27, 2010 6:51 am, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> On 09/25/2010 03:05 PM, Hartmut Noack wrote:
>>> Interesting though what to do with SunO))))) and the like
>>
>> One listens to Sun O))) live or from vinyl.
>
> maybe. but that doesn't cover 谭� or �îñ. �êàäåìè÷åñêèé
> ñèìôîíè÷åñêèé
> îðêåñòð ����, �èðèæåð �. �âåòëàíîâ
>
> not to mention tracks that feature combinations of all of these
> characters: ,:'")(\
>
> this is why you don't want to use shell scripts for this stuff.
> basically, the set of all possible UTF-8 characters in a filename is
> the full possible set of all UTF-8 characters. there are no characters
> left other than null that can act as word separators.
>

Well I found out today that even perl gets confused with *some* utf-8
chars so don't rely on that either :-)


-- 
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux