On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:10:59PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: > On Sunday 26 September 2010 06:45:42 Joel Roth wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: > > > And because python afaik still > > > has the big interpreter lock, effectively suppressing any python multi- > > > threading. Which you work around by re-implementing your heavy-math parts > > > in C and run them outside the interpreter lock (but still from within > > > threads created and managed from python)... > > > > What, no native threads. Mock horror! > > Native threads: Yes. > But only one python interpreter to run. At least in python2.X. > As long as you call long-running non-python functions in the other threads, > you are fine (like the run() function of your audio-apps jack-engine). Interesting. There do seem to be a growing number of python apps for audio, video and music. So far the unix process model serves my needs well enough. Regards, Joel > Arnold > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user -- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
