Surprisingly enough, I am using a period of 64. Apparently kernel development is going strong :-) J.E.B. On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 22:04 +0200, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:28:25PM -0500, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote: > > > I was very surprised to see Jack2 working well set to realtime + > > soft mode, with a normal (non-rt) kernel, giving me 2.67 ms stated > > latency without kernel crashes in Fedora 13. Anyone doing it this > > way? Anyone see disadvantages? So far it's pretty gravy for me. > > I've been using unpatched (for RT) kernels (2.6.32 and 2.6.33) for > some time on a number of audio systems, and they all work very well > with period sizes of 256 and 128 (didn't test any lower ones). > Seems like unpatched kernels are performing quite well these days. > The only problem I've had was with the 'nouveau' video module for > Nvidia cards - on two systems it made even a period size of 1024 > unusable (and I had to replace it with the older nv) while on the > others there were no problems at all. > > Ciao, > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
