Am 06.07.2010 08:12, schrieb Louigi Verona:
I have posted Paul Davis criticism of my article on my site and commented it
a bit, though not very thoroughly yet.
http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=authorship&a=authorship_property_criticism
In my opinion, this is a very useful turn of reasoning which allowed me to
understand more in the relation of ideas, physical object and
scarcity.
In your comments you discuss the question of scarcity of ideas and you
compare ideas and physical objects. But I do not think, that we talk
about ideas here.
We talk about manifestations of ideas in the form of compositions and
recordings.
If someone says:
"Use all 12 tones available. Do not repeat a tone before you have
written a basic line that contains all 12 tones. Do not write seqences."
Well: This is indeed, an idea and nothing more or less. And everybody
can use it to write new music without even attribute it to Schönberg in
any way.
But if someone samples a few minutes of "Moses and Aaron" to make a
simple beat sound more interesting, the situation is different. It may
have took Schönberg many years of thinking an studying to come up with
Dodekaphonics but it took him only 10 minutes to write down the rules
abovementioned. He should be attributed and praised for writing down the
rules but he has never claimed a right to make money with these rules or
even control their usage.
But "Moses and Aaron" took Schönberg months if not years to write and of
course he claimed a right to be compensated for this work. Because he
needed to: pay rent, buy food, having luxouriuos suits taylored,
travelling the world etc etc etc.
One may philosophize all day and all of the night about how works of art
are derived from traditions that belong to everyone or if maybe Shiva,
Hekate or God himself or mother earth or whatever instance beyond our
realm of economics and physical needs are to be attributed for
inspiration. But nobody can ignore physical needs, at least not for long ;-)
It is a social issue: creators need food and shelter, they need a social
status that is adeaquate to their work. The given system of ASCAP,
entertainment industry, etc does this job. But it does it very bad. With
a unacceptable level of control about the artists and their work and the
usage of this work by the public. And with an unacceptable overhead that
leaves only but a few percent of the money users pay for getting the
works, for the artists.
So there should be a better system to make sure the work of artists will
be compensated if you want fulltime artists.
And such work is scarce, because you need to have people working for
months to get an album filled with ideas manifested in actual
recordings. The ideas themselfs may be in the artists minds anyway, you
do not need to rent a rehearsal room or to learn how to play an
instrument or how to program a sequencer to have an idea. But you do
have to do all these things to make an idea become something, you can
actually share with others.
best regards
HZN
Hope you guys also find it useful. Feel free to tackle the subject
around.
Louigi Verona.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
