On Friday 02 July 2010 09:57:00 Andrew C wrote: > Drew, > > Actually yes, both the server and the client are GPL, so I guess you could > do cover songs and such on privately hosted jams (not using the servers > listed on the ninjam site). Thanks for the info. Personally, I would prefer to do BY-SA songs. I don't like NC and ND. > > Andrew. drew > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:32 PM, drew Roberts <zotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday 01 July 2010 22:05:33 Andrew C wrote: > > > Hey list, > > > > > > I recently discovered Ninjam, a non-realtime (non realtime in the sense > > > > you > > > > > play over the previous bar that someone else played and vice versa) > > > internet jamming app available for linux, windows and mac. Software is > > > Open-source and licensed under the GPL (which version, I'll have to > > > check the sources) > > > > Last first and then I will comment on the above. > > > > > and the audio generated from licenced under the " Attribution, > > > Noncommercial, Share Alike Creative Commons License > > > v2.5<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>". > > > > Seems a bit over the top to not allow the person starting the jam to set > > a desired cc license. > > > > Also seems dicey in that people could play stuff for which they don't > > hold a > > copyright on. > > > > Now to comment on the GPL bit in light of the cc license bit above. > > > > Is the client GPL and the server not? If the server is available and GPL > > too, > > someone could add in the license option bit and run it on a different > > site I > > guess. > > > > Does anyone know? > > > > all the best, > > > > drew > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > !DSPAM:4c2df0ed267831804284693! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
