On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> YouTube is an interesting case. I didn't read what the decision was >> but I hear they won a judgment against (I think) Viacom a few days ago >> allowing them to keep posting stuff, or at least to leave it online if >> someone else posts it. > > this is a bit inaccurate. the ruling said that as long as YT can > demonstrate that they respond effectively to legitimate take-down > notices, they are not guilty of copyright infringement just because > somebody posted something that they should not have. the court ruled > that YT have demonstrated this, at least in the case of Viacom's > alleged abuses. > Thanks for the clarifications. Saves me the hassle of reading it myself. (But not the responsibility for understanding it!) Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
