Re: GPL vs GPLv3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:53 +0200, Atte André Jensen wrote:

> Thanks! Again is it simply a matter of stating on the web page that the 
> licence is CC Attribution?

The CC licenses also have version numbers and a country/jurisdiction (or
unported). So an actual license could be CC BY 2.5 Denmark.

Ideally, you should describe how attribution should happen.

I'm very unsure about the interaction between international use and
country of origin of the author of a work (especially if that becomes
authors and countries ...).

So personally, I see putting my own work under some (unported) CC
license as a statement of my intentions, may there be gaping juristic
holes or not :)

Try http://creativecommons.org/choose/


-- 
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux