Re: I just don't know Jack anymore.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Ken Restivo wrote:

Jack+Debian:  This situation will be improving.  Probably won't be in
time for squeeze, though.  Not a simple problem to fix, though... because
applications have to link to /something/ -- and the library follows the
jackd implementation.


Wait, what? All the apps have to be recompiled in order to switch jack implementations?

No, they don't have to be recompiled.

From a packaging point-of-view, that's what makes it so
hard. I'm not at all an expert on the subject, but the confusion goes something like this:

Package `cool_tracker` requires `libjack0`

`libjack0` is supplied by Jack1 _and_ Jack2. If you switch jackd's, you have to switch libjack0. So, then you get something like:

   libjack0-jack1 (provides libjack0)
   libjack0-jack2 (provides libjack0)

Suppose user does:

   $ apt-get cool_tracker

Now, which one gets installed by default?

And when a someone packages `cool_tracker`

   $ gcc -o cool_tracker `pkg-config --cflags --libs jack` cool_tracker.c

Then cool_tracker has a link to /usr/lib/libjack.so.0

So... you have to make sure that the .deb package says it needs the virtual libjack0 package instead of libjack0-jack2 (which is what the packager has installed).

THEN, you run into ABI issues between Jack1 and Jack2. Theoretically, there should be none -- but last I check, Jack2 is missing some of Jack1's symbols.

-gabriel

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux