On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 15:43 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-05-15 02:38:15 +0200: > > On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 14:12 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote: > > > On 14 May 2010 at 22:40, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On 14 May 2010 19:03, Folderol <folderol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Don't forger 64studio either > > > > > ... which I believe is on the verge of a new release :) > > > > > > > > OK, all in all, don't forget to check > > > > http://www.linux-sound.org/distro.html > > > > > > Yeah, but some of that is a little outdated. For instance, Thac's > > > RPMs for Mandrake, is a bit old. Mandrake became Mandriva, and Thac > > > went on to create PCLinuxOS as an alternative. > > > > > > Thanks tho.... > > > > > > -- > > For those who want the latest of just about everything, Arch is not too > > bad. More DIY from the audio perspective though, there IS an audio repo > > but I think it seriously lacks manpower to do updating. I do have 40+ > > packages, more than half audio-related which I 'compile from source', > > but Arch's AUR (user-submitted PKGBUILDs to generate packages) makes > > that easy except for the wait-time of compiling, dependency-checking and > > such are all done in the PKGBUILD. > > It's quite contrary to what the thread starter wants though. He wants a > distro that is ready for audio production without much setup. Arch has > its strengths, I use it and love it, but it takes time to set it up and > configure everything. Its flexibility is its weakness :) Hence my first line =). _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
