On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <pedro.lopez.cabanillas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if you're not writing applications that do realtime synthesis or have other uses for sample accurate delivery of MIDI data, then there's no reason to use JACK MIDI. that assumes that you don't mind your users need to use a bridge client in the event that they use a MIDI application that does have those needs.
Why should I adopt any new API for my programs in replacement of a good old
one that gives me everything I need?
if you're not writing applications that do realtime synthesis or have other uses for sample accurate delivery of MIDI data, then there's no reason to use JACK MIDI. that assumes that you don't mind your users need to use a bridge client in the event that they use a MIDI application that does have those needs.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
