On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 07:50:12PM -1000, david wrote : > Aurelien wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:37:42AM +0200, torbenh wrote : > >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:34:11AM +0200, Aurelien wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I'm always hesitating between netjack1/2. > >>> > >>> Considering netjack1 and sync transport. I works fine, but I would like > >>> the master to set the tempo for the slave(s), and it looks like netjack1 > >>> does not that (in the jackdmp version, at least). Am I wrong? Is there a > >>> way to get the tempo from master to slave? > >> no. you definitely need a transportmaster on the slave. > > > > OK. > > This gives another point to netjack2! > > > > Concerning my problems with my network, it finally seems like both my > > gigabit ethernet cards (Atheros Attansic L1) works in .... 10MB!!! That > > should explain why I get these offset of 3 to 16 (!!!) cycles! > > > > It's weird, as the card is supported by the kernel, and lshw tells it > > works at 1GB, but however, rate is around 10MB and lower. > > Hmmm - you don't happen to have your gigabit cards connected via a > non-gigabit router/switch? Faster cards will usually happily connect at > slower speeds if that's the best something along the way can do ... > No router, no switch, just two machines with the very same ethernet card and distribution and kernel linked one to the other. Actually, I've checked by monitoring network with iptraf. The result is clear : scp => transfer rate ~= 1Gb/s netjack2 => transfer rate < 20Mb/s -- Aurélien _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
