On Wednesday 21 April 2010 11:26:24 Roberto wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:28:06AM +0200, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:34:38PM -0700, Ken Restivo wrote: > > > and is there some reason I should do it in this > > > day and age? > > > > No. Unless you know the signal will end up in a very > > very very crappy DA converter, and you want to give > > that one preferential treatment at the expense of all > > others. > > Hello Fons. Almost all consumer portable devices seem to distort signals > above 16Khz in uncompressed 44100Hz audio. I always wondered about this, > maybe they all have very crappy DA converters, Or maybe its because many low-end sound-devices nowadays work with 48kHz fixed and re-sample everything else in hardware or in software. And then it depends on the sampling-algorithm, where I would not be surprised if these are not up- to-par with Fons'. Arnold
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
