On Tuesday 13 April 2010 08:58:55 Ken Restivo wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 08:50:56AM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: > > On Monday 12 April 2010 23:41:10 micromoog wrote: > > > 2010/4/12 Jörn Nettingsmeier <nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > if all those cable and bit transparency fetishists knew how reference > > > > classical recordings are produced, the whole discussion (and large > > > > parts of the high-end market) would go down in flames. > > > I for one am interested in this . . . how *are* those top-end reference > > > recordings produced? Using an old pair of headphones as mics, with long > > > coils of electrical extension cord for cabling? :P > > A pair of coal-mics and a strip of field telephone cable from the army > > supply will suffice :-P > Who needs a mic? If you just yell into a cheap guitar cable really loud, it > works just fine. Even my two year old knows you need a xlr cable for mic and longer paths to the mixer...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user