On 3/16/10, drew Roberts <zotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 15 March 2010 15:26:14 sevol wrote: >> > Which CC License? If a good one, couldn't fixes be sent along? >> >> It says: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic. >> >> But understand, nobody in their right mind would want my fixes. O_o > > Not such a good one then. > > Sure, no one would likely want mine either, but someone's fixes might > improve > things. > > all the best, > > drew > _______________________________________________ Totally, I think at least the idea of the site has great possibilities, & hopefully, the accuracy of info will get better as time goes on. As for the license, I think some of your comments from other threads on LAU have made me more aware of all the variant CC licenses, but generally it's not something I go out of my way to look at in much detail. Perhaps I should more often. thanks, -s _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
