Hi, On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:16 -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Gerald Mwangi <gerald.mwangi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, does anyone know a synth powerfull like zynadd, phasex or > > bristol,but in dssi format? I need something I can load into Rosegarden, > > since I dont want 10 Standalones running, until ardour, rg and the > > synths support LASH, if that ever happens. > > I have no idea why, but I have a warm, fuzzy soft place in my heart > for DSSI plugins. they always seem to just work. whysynth has > already been mentioned, but be sure to check out the calf monosynth, > which can be run as a DSSI plugin: > > jack-dssi-host calf.so:Monosynth > > check out the DSSI home page too, for a lot of other options. > > I'm hoping this thread will reveal some that I don't know about! we > really need something like specimen in DSSI format. > > > I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for > > linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues > > disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha. > > I'm thinking of having Jack require a Load/Save callback, prior to > > activating the client. How feasible is that? > Sorry I'm just in the middle of a production, and had to explode a litte. I was experimenting with a lot of synths and found those to be usefull, which aren't in plugin format. > why oh why oh why did you throw this paragraph in? now no one wants > to talk about DSSI anymore... :( > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user