Re: ambiophonics vs. ambisonics?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Martin Leese
> <martin.leese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This is just the old Hafler circuit.  It doesn't
>> really compare with Ambisonics.
>
> it doesn't. but i have to say that since i first encountered it,
> thanks to brian eno's noodlings on the cover of, hmm, can't recall,
> but one of the earliest recordings on EG, i've always been struck at
> what a big improvement it makes to an otherwise stereo setup.

Absolutely.  I used the Hafler circuit for
18 years, and much preferred it to
two-speaker stereo.  (I bought a used
Ambisonic decoder in 1996 or so, and now
much prefer that to the Hafler circuit.)

Regards,
Martin
-- 
Martin J Leese
E-mail: martin.leese  stanfordalumni.org
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux