On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:02:35PM +0200, Fritz Meissner wrote: > Received this reply direct to me - forwarding to list for general info. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: 28 February 2010 21:44 > Subject: Re: Jack included in Main for Ubuntu Lucid Lynx > To: Fritz Meissner <meissner.fritz@xxxxxxxxx> > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Fritz Meissner wrote: > > On 28 February 2010 20:56, rosea grammostola > > wrote: > >> On 2/28/10, Fritz Meissner wrote: > >>> On 28 February 2010 20:29, rosea grammostola > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 2/28/10, Fritz Meissner <meissner.fritz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > I'm not sure if this is old news to others, but I just noticed that > >>>> > jack has been approved for inclusion in main for Ubuntu Lucid Lynx; > >>>> > this means that now PortAudio can be built with support for jack and > >>>> > we hopefully will be able to have a distro that "just works" for > >>>> > >>>> PortAudio or Pulseaudio? > >>>> > >>> Sorry, I meant Pulseaudio, but Portaudio is also assisted by this; > >>> there are a number of other benefits to, including making Firewire > >>> devices accessible to audio packages without needing to recomplile > >>> them. The Main Inclusion Report for jack at > >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionReportJACK summarises the > >>> benefits nicely. > >>> > >>> Fritz > >> > >> Will it really be possible in lucid to let pulseaudio work with jack1 and jack2? > >> Or are there still difficulties? > >> > > I'd be fascinated to know the answer to that one. It should be much > > the same result as for someone who is at present running Pulseaudio > > hand compiled with jack support, if anyone can report on their > > results. My impression is that most people with problems have rather > > removed PA than try to make it work with jack, so data may be scarce. > > > > At Fedora, we have pulseaudio that is supposedly compiled with jack > support for a while now. Since the pulseaudio is a Fedora driven > software, I would assume that we should have the best pulseaudio > support. However, still it doesn't work properly. I still tell our > users it is best to get rid of pulseaudio if they want to do audio > production. > > So, please don't raise your expectations. Pulseaudio is the same > cra... uh, the same annoyance. hmm... dunno. i am on debian. of course pa is build with jack support. and it doesnt really do anything bad. it just sits there. hogging a jack port. it seems to go away, when i kill jackd. never investigated where it went then. -- torben Hohn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
