more than 4 channels for listening? Really?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Folks,

I'm an audio lover that prefers smaller speakers in smaller spaces and i
don't need/want 5-8 speakers in my listening space.  I have found that i
prefer the effect of vocals/sound effects that are mixed in center in
stereo speakers,  over a center channel.  It sounds more natural and
rounded to me.

I would think that the same thing could be done in the rear speakers of
course and also front to back by adjusting the front-back balance of
sounds.

Couldn't one create the sound of a fly moving through out a room simply
by adjusting the balance of 4 speakers?

If so why do we need more than 4 speakers?

I have an audio system for which i'd like to set up 4 channels. I have 2
Anthony Gallo Acoustic Reference 3.1s and would like to swap them out
for 4 Stradas and 4 subs (with some extra money of course).  

If i do that and play back a 5.1 or 7.1 movie soundtrack or music disc
what am i going to not have vs a full 5 or 7 channel set up?

Will things down-mix properly (using pulse audio for reference)?

Bearcat M. Sandor


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux