Re: wikipedia: jack may not meet notability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bengt Gördén wrote:
> Wouldn't your articles in LJ about jack constitute a reliable secondary source?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
>   

Hi Bengt,

I'm not sure if these articles meet the criteria, but if anyone's 
interested in adding these URLs to the Wikipedia entry, feel free to do so:

    JACK Sync: A Primer For Linux Users - 
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1004080

    Knowing JACK - 
http://w3.linux-magazine.com/issue/67/JACK_Audio_Server.pdf

    Computer Music and the Linux Operating System: A Report - 
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/014892603322730488

All are out of date to some degree, but they also contain some 
still-useful information. The CMJ article includes special mention of JACK.

Best,

dp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux