On 02/17/2010 11:01 AM, Bengt Gördén wrote: > onsdag 17 februari 2010 05:10:26 skrev Dave Phillips: >> Chuckk Hubbard wrote: >>> Agreed, it's not the ideal article. References to sources regarding >>> Linux audio in general that address JACK might help, if they want >>> sources not directly related to the topic. > > > Wouldn't your articles in LJ about jack constitute a reliable secondary > source? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources fwiw, i've been over that article and deleted both the notability tag (which was uncalled for to begin with, more a symptom of the general messiness of that article), and the missing citations tag (after adding copious amounts)... however, there are still a number of unverified claims, some even newly added by yours truly, so a few more secondary sources couldn't hurt. does anyone know how one starts a new category in wikipedia? i think that applications list is superfluous, unmaintainable, out-of-date, and out-of-place. the article would be better served with a new category "Apps that support JACK" or something, and a link to the category index. best, jörn _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
