Re: 1980's cds: analog to digital conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:35 PM, Aaron L. wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've noticed that I do indeed have some aversion to the cd-version of
> records I otherwise liked on another format (i.e. vinyl or cassette.)
>
> So why are there cds that I think actually do sound good?
>
> How has this process changed?

The most common reason is that because vinyl records don't have a flat
response, vinyl has a preempahsis applied to the HF.  Sometimes the
preemphasis was applied during cutting, sometimes it was applied to
the tape master before cutting.  When early CDs were pressed, they
were often pressed from the vinyl masters and if the preemphasis was
on the master, boom, harsh gritty super-over-bright CD.

Monty
 
Your description is right on.

'Piece of Mind' on CD still sounds good to me -- sweet guitars, crisp drums, very simple and uncluttered mix.  It's not like the over-distorted, over-processed, and over-compressed crap that too often makes it to CD these days.  (n.b. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war)

I want my dynamic range back!

-Sean

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux