On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:49:58 +0100 torbenh <torbenh@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:15:05PM -0500, David Santamauro wrote: > > > > So I guess my question is simply: is netjack2 really that capable > > and if so, what are the tweaks involved to get seemless audio using > > it. > > > > Does anyone here use netjack2 ... and if so, what is the primary > > purpose? > > are you running the slave jackd with -S ? > thats necessary. I wasn't, but did and the xruns subsided substantially. But still nothing that I would consider "studio quality". I did some network tests and although I have a small(er) pipe, jackd with the -net backend only consumes ~2% of the bandwidth with 2 channels of audio. There are no bottlenecks on the client or server machine: cpu is 98% idle, I/O is minimal -- so I'm left wondering. I'd really like to use this as I have random machines hanging around that could pick up small duties, like the tasks described in that article. > [insert some random bitching about netjack2 here] > I think it is an excellent tool -- well, I want it to be an excellent tool ;) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
