On 02/12/2010 12:42 PM, sv-e@xxxxxxx wrote: >>> Are you saying it's a hoax ? >>> >> >> I've listened to it a bit more closely (well, for about 30 secs, I think >> this is horrible) and I think this is a studio recording and they added >> some background noise afterwards. Also because the background noise >> doesn't loop, no effects affect the background noise, it makes me wonder >> how this is recorded. Or they recorded the video and he did some >> overdubs afterwards. But hopefully for the guy I'm wrong. And even >> though a lot of comments mention that this guy has talent I oppose to >> that. This is a good example of craftsmanship, not talent. >> >> Jeremy > > > 30 seconds of serious listening ? Well, you can't really seriously judge a recording after having listened to it for 30 secs, I know. It is just my impression. And I guess my impression is pretty biased too because I don't like this kind of music. I should've better watched the whole video. > > I have no experience with that kind of music, but the background noise > doesn't have to come from the microphone he's using for vocals, but could > come from the video cameras microphone. An ordinary vocal microphone is > not that sensitive at all. > That video camera must have a damn' good microphone on it then I reckon :) > The fact that he is capable of making the loops write the lyrics and > perform it all together makes me think he's got lot's of "talent" > > /sv-e Being able to multitask doesn't equal talent. There are a lot of musicians who master just one or two instruments who have a lot more talent than this guy. As an anology, it reminds me of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtp2TWI1764 The guy is very good at doing his thing but it's no art and you don't need to be talented to do such a thing. Best, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
