Re: A sound decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10 February 2010 05:08, hollunder <hollunder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-02-09 21:52:11 +0100:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:26:36PM -0200, A. C. Censi wrote:
>>
>> > Arch Linux system custom 2.6.31,6-rt19 kernel with RT preemption
>>
>> By Archlinux standards you're way behind !
>> Update ! Update ! I have 2.6.32 ! :-) :-)
>>
>> Ciao,
>
> Show me your 2.6.32 rt kernel ;)
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/
>
> But yeah, 2.6.31.12-rt20 is out since a while. There won't be a 2.6.32-rt, next stop is .33

Ahh cmon..these guys do real work, and make the base work for them!
Another guy that comes to mind is Songshop. And most of us with an
Arch system have an old trusty RT kernel, because unlike the rest, we
actually need to do stuff (like production, rather than development).
The distro is really just secondary.


--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux