Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 18:56 +0100 schrieb fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:43:22PM +0100, hermann wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 00:37 +0100 schrieb > fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > > > If you want to test this just drop me a line to get > > > the sources. > > > > My first tests: > > > > It's excellent as a guitar tuner, nice and simple to use. > > As retuner, it sounds a bit muddy when the tone comes out of tune, > the > > pitch wipe up and down like a chorus effect, when the tone comes > near > > enough to a tune it work's nice and fast to correct the last missing > > semitones. May a selection for the working (semi tone) range could > be > > helpful, to let the tones, witch are to far from any tune, alone, or > to > > cut them away. > > If you keep all notes enabled the correction will never be > more than half a semitone. Jretune is not supposed to do > much more - e.g. changing the notes of a melody. I mean less, it will be nice if we could choose to correct less then a half semitone, 0.1 or 0.2 for example, and let the rest untouched. Not every tone needs to be in tune, sometimes, . . . Just as suggestion. I haven d look at the source, so I dont know if that will introduce more CPU usage, for now, jretune needs just 3% of my CPU Info Intel Pentium 4 512 KB cache flags( sse2 ) clocked at [ 2591.849 MHz ] regards hermann > Correcting more will always produce a colouration of the > voice - this is because not only the pitch is retuned, > but the spectrum (formants) also move up or down. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
