Re: Sanity check needed: Fons's Auto Wah on 64-bit system and CPU usage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Philipp ??berbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from Ken Restivo's message of Thu Jan 14 02:38:04 +0100 2010:
> > I've been running Fons's great Auto-Wah on my 32-bit Netbook for many months
> > now, using it live constantly, and I love it.
> > 
> > I'm going into the studio Friday, so I've dusted off my 64-bit Core 2 Duo
> > system and putting it through its paces.
> > 
> > Turns out that on my Core2Duo, JACK RACK running Fons's auto-wah plugin sucks
> > up 6% CPU even if there is no sound going through it.
> > 
> > I asked Fons about it; he can't duplicate the problem since he doesn't have a
> > 64-bit system. Hell, I can't even duplicate it on my 32-bit system; it's 64-bit
> > dependent.
> > 
> > I looked at the output with Bitmeter at Fons' suggestion, and it seems there
> > are no denormals, inf's, or nans-- just a very small -230dB DC offset in the
> > code (probably to avoid denormals).
> > 
> > The CPU usage ramps up before any signal is fed into the plugin. It runs
> > normally when there is signal, but then it keeps sucking up CPU afterwards. I'm
> > feeding it from fluidsynth, and bitmeter says that it isn't sending anthing at
> > all during silent moments.
> > 
> > It doesn't run away to 99% CPU (or 50% on a Core2Duo), like it would if there
> > were a denormal. But still, why is it using up CPU when there's no signal? That
> > seems odd. And why only on my 64-bit machine? FWIW, the 64-bit and 32-bit
> > machines I have are even running the same kernel and RT-patch versions
> > (2.6.26.8-rt12).
> > 
> > Can someone with a 64-bit system help me by trying to duplicate the problem?
> > I'm looking to see if JACK-RACK running just Fons' plugin uses as much CPU with
> > silence as when there's signal running through it.
> > 
> > Oh, and in case it's setting-dependent, here is the rack with the settings I'm
> > using:
> > 
> > http://restivo.org/misc/clavy-phaser.rack
> > 
> > -ken
> 
> Hi Ken.
> I'm on 64 bit, so I thought I give it a shot, however, my 64 bit system
> is a bit unusual since it's only a single core celeron.
> 
> The result is vastly different from yours, cpu usage of jack-rack in
> htop is 0.0% most of the time, occasionally it shows 1.0%, so not even
> when running it shows the 6% you get.
> I only give it some webradio from mplayer, and it doesn't seem to matter
> whether it's playing or not or whether it's connected, it's all the
> same. I was clever enough to enable the plugin in jack-rack.
> 
> What I do get around 6% is mem usage (out of 1GB).
> 

What are your JACK period settings? Is it less than 64? Mine are
-R -P70 -dalsa -X seq -r48000 -p128 -n3 -Phw:1,0 -Chw:1,1

Fons' code is like a finely-crafted jewel, and it is written in a terse style that looks to me like hand-optimised ASM code (i.e., variable names that are more like register names: "_s1", "gy", "dx"), but I'm starting to understand it a little bit.

It looks like he's windowing through the frames, and if the frame is > 80 bytes, he windows through it in 64-byte increments. I am using 3 periods of 128bytes each.

-ken
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux