> 3) Although I did this myself, sox is not really nice to wrap in the > first place, since it sometimes changes the names of the arguments and > stuff like that. So your script might not work after the next upgrade of > sox :-( > In a completely different situation I want throught this same dilemma and finally concluded that the only alternative for scripting some sensible audio manipulation of that kind after some research was wave or snak. I finally went for calling sox through subprocess... Would be nice if sox functionality were in some python library. Lorenzo _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
