On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would be pretty cool if jack had functions to do the time<->beat > calculation but sadly most jack developers seem to think that tempo and tempo- > maps (not even live) do not belong into jack... i don't agree with this assessment. the reason that tempo information is not more usefully presented in JACK is that at least at the time that work on JACK transport was done, we did not feel that there was any reasonable consensus on how to present a shared tempo map to applications. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
