Re: [LAD] Is TerminatorX development stalled?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well the reason for why I'd like to develope tX is its midi capabilities and the workflow.
I want to use it as a sampler triggered by an external sequencer, and not actually as a DJ-proggy. I dont know how good the midi capabilities of Mixx are.

In general Mixxx and tX are incomparable, since Mixxx only allows for 2 turntables, or am I wrong?
Gerald

On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:20 +0100, Dubphil wrote:
rosea grammostola a écrit , Le 30.12.2009 22:53:
> gerald mwangi wrote:
>   
>> OK, I'll start to work on it, but it will take some time.
>> Maybe someone has experience with librubberband?
>> Gerald
>>     
> Is it really a good idea to spend time on TerminatorX? Couldn't you 
> better add 'Abbleton features' to mixxx, hydrogen or non-sequencer/daw? 
> It looks to me those apps have more potential to survive.
> I could be wrong though.
>
> Regards,
>
> \r
>   

Mixxx hasn't the same scratch taste, Tx scratch effect is really 
amazing, I don't know why...
IMHO It would be nice to make it survive, but personnaly I don't need 
the Ableton feature :)

Regards

Philippe
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux