Re: [ANN] MusE 1.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> On Mon Dec 21 19:05 , david  sent:
> 
>> Robert Jonsson wrote:
>>
>>>> One suggestion (but it may be too big a deal as the KDE folks found out!), go
>>>> to the more up to date QT4.
>>> There are no immediate plans to move, Qt3 should be around in distros
>>> yet for a few years. But eventually we will move. Not the least,
>>> there's stuff in Qt4 that would be nice to use. :)
>> Don't rush it. Just keep in mind that there's stuff in Qt4 that doesn't 
>> work that works fine in Qt3, too.
>>
>> -- 
> 
> TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about jackmidi and other
> features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From my understanding
> QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't necessarily bring more sequencer
> functionality in. (correct me if I'm wrong) However migrating could require a
> major overhaul....
> 
> Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or so and
> MusE is functioning really really well.  It may look a bit dated.. but that's
> really not the point is it? 

I'm no fan of eye candy, and that's what I think 90% of the Qt4-based 
KDE4 *is*. I'd rather have my music computer's processor and memory 
being used for audio than eye candy. ;-)

-- 
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux