On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:37:03 +0000 Folderol <folderol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:46:28 +0000 > Gwenhwyfaer <gwenhwyfaer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > A general plea to web designers everywhere: Either do ALL of your > > layout (inc. colours) in CSS, and use HTML tags ONLY according to > > their semantic meaning - or commit to doing as much layout in HTML as > > you can, and only adding trimmings in CSS. Because if your webpage is > > unreadable without CSS, it's unreadable. > > This is what I'm trying to work towards. However, it's a steep learning > curve, and ultimately I simply want a website that is easy to maintain, > and looks reasonable on most browsers. > > This test page is already dramatically better than the rest of my site, > but there will come a point of diminishing returns, and I'd rather make > music that websites :) I've now more or less settled on the style I want (implementation may need more polish). If anyone is interested the link is: http://www.musically.me.uk/newindex.html The first three page links are valid, as are all the music links. The entries are *supposed* to be centred, but only Opera an IE7 do that correctly as far as I know, and IE7 gets the vertical distances wrong - I don't know if it actually does the span text at all. Firefox and all the other geko based browsers seem to get everything right except the centreing. w3c validates as 100% html, and almost as good css - there are a couple of webkit links which may or may not work! Comments welcome. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
