>>>> I still haven't got round on which is the best way to run linux-nativ >>>> >>>>> VSTs. For dlls it's maily FST. JOST seems very unstable, but maybe >>>>> I'm missing something. >>>>> >>>> Well, first of all you need a host that supports it. Just looked very >>>> quickly at the websites of muse and rosegarden, and neither seems to >>>> support vsts. >>>> >>>> NB: I'm using renoise... >>>> >>> From http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html#Features : >>> >>> LADSPA <http://www.ladspa.org/>, DSSI <http://dssi.sourceforge.net/> and >>> native VST <http://www.steinberg.net/>i plug-in support. >>> Sorry but I'm still not sure if I understand correctly. To be a little clear, what I mean is 'what to do with the .so'? And can they work *without* steinberg vst etc. In this case which applications support .so? Otherwise what is the real advantage of using 'native' vst (.so) vs windows vst (.dll), given that FST - for instance - will work with any jack-enabled applications. Bests, Lorenzo. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user