Scott Ecker wrote: > david wrote: > >> ... >> >> I see people on the list running much lower latencies than 64msec, and >> seemingly trying to get even lower ... >> > > You can't punch-in at 64ms and expect it to sound good. At 4ms it's > seamless, literally. > > Indeed. I think the ll issue is of real importance when recording. At 64 ms multitrack recording/playback is a not very satisfying experience. Best, dp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
