Am 09.12.2009 um 13:13 schrieb Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@xxxxxxxxx>: > Patrick Shirkey wrote: > >>> That, to me, it the only sensible way to think about it. The fact >>> that >>> we're linux based, might mean something to *us*, but the listener >>> doesn't care. To me it's just about as arbitrary reason as >>> starting a >>> label based on which brand of shoes we wear. >> Never forget that millions of albums have been sold based on that >> concept so you might be onto something there :-) > > :-) > > I hope you realize that I absolutely love both my linux box and you > guys! It's nothing to do with that. > > I'm just thinking what profile should such a label have? If it's > "only" > the fact that the music is produced with linux, it's main goal I guess > would be to promote linux as a pro-audio platform. But that's just > fine. > > I imagine most netlabels (besides from the "we, a group of friends, > start this label to promote our own music") are started with > motivations, more like "this undergroundish genre needs a platform" or > something that rhymes with that. > If there was a revision control system that could handle binary files well, and if there was decent linux audio session managment, now that would be something to build a linux netlabel on... - Burkhard > -- > Atte > > http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
