|
RAID-5 is good for first-echelon file servers and Exchange servers.
RAID-10 is much better, certainly, but RAID-5 is much better than
RAID-1 for those purposes. Of course, for audio I want it all in RAM cache :-) J.E.B. I don't want to start a flame-war but all raids starting with f are considered bad: http://www.baarf.com/You beat me to this, Arnold. The only thing I'd use RAID 5 for is an array of disks where performance really doesn't matter to me, like a disk-based backup server. I'd never use RAID 5 on a system where performance mattered at all to me, like my studio machine! |
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
