Re: jconv settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Arnold Krille <arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2009 23:51:08 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> You are both very right about this. Gold-plating the cpu socket will
>> do wonders for the light and fast bits used to convolve the first few
>> kilosamples of a long IR - being light (and thus having little kinetic
>> energy) they really need low-resistance paths. For the later parts
>> of the IR jconv uses heavy bits, and a lot of them. Having all this
>> mass vibrate can put excessive stress on you CPU.
>
> As far as I know blind-tests show that there is no statistical prove that
> gold-plating on the cpu is any better then using a melted coat-hanger.
> It all depends on whether you talk to your cpu in a nice language and treat it
> with some goodies every now and then...

What kind of goodies do you recommend?  Spilling coffee on the keyboard?
-- 
 joq
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux