Re: which audio synthesis environment?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



just read this:

cunnilinux himself schrieb:
>>> But actually you guys lost me a bit, what is so important about the plugin paradigma?
> 
> if you have quite a lot plugins with good presets, you actually don't
> have to learn anything. just try this and try that, and you've done.
> 
wow, its against all my views and ways to make (electronic) music. When 
I started in 1983 the first synths with storage were already available 
but relying on presets was quite uncommon, it felt a bit like using a 
homekeyboard. I am the one who deletes all presets first when getting a 
new hardware synth with storage, as with the last additions V-SynthXT 
and Machinedrum to the studio.

Do you really think you can create something interesting these days with 
riding presets? I start to recognize Omnisphere everywhere, just like 
Korg Wavestation in the 90s. Actually I am a bit afraid that using the 
old tools in the old ways bears old sounding results. Now that sonically 
everything is possible I am starting to rethinking and questioning the 
typical (software) sequencers, thoughts which are actually much much older.

A bit of more sonic creativity can spice up every genre.

Cheers,

Malte

-- 
----
media art + development
http://www.block4.com

new software released: contrOSC, control your Mackie C4 with OSC
http://controsc.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux