On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:06:10 +0200 Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Atte Andre Jensen wrote: > > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > > > > >> why Csound backend and not SuperCollider? > >> > > > > I was so excited about this that I started browsing and found these: > > > > pd: > > http://www.halftheory.com/hetleveiker/pdvst.html > > http://www-crca.ucsd.edu/~jsarlo/pdvst/ > > > > csound: > > http://www.csounds.com/manual/html/CommandCsoundVST.html > > > > They all seem windows-ish to me, but given the cross platform > > nature of both projects, it might not be far fetched to have it > > going under linux. > > > > I asked on both the pd list and the csound list for input on the > > current status of running them as native linux vst plugins, I'll > > get back with any followups here. > > > > NB: A quick google search seems suggest that super collider is not > > this far in this regard (being used as vst plugin) :-( > > > Thanks for searching. > In my search to an environment I got the feeling that SuperCollider > is a more modern language, a language for the future so to say. It's > better suitable to compete those VST plugins maybe... > I can see that is seems to be more easy to make a PD gui, but this > should be possible with SC too right? Don't know if the language is > ready for that yet. > Please post also a message to the SC mailinglist, then you get a more > general/objective view... > > Regards, > > \r Isn't one of those languages already able to spit out various plug-in formats and/or at least C code? Was it csound, supercollider or chuck? Philipp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
