Atte Andre Jensen wrote: > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > >> And why do you use Chuck Atte? >> > > At first I was fascinated by the live coding capabilities, but in the > end I never practiced enough to actually be able to do it live :-( > > What kept me in the loop was the very clear and well laid out > documentation which in some way fitted well with where I came from in > programming. > > What I love now are the algorithmic possibilities and the fact it's so > easy to build your environment with OOP. > > However I'm reaching the limits performance wise. I almost finished a > csound backend for my setup that let's me migrate cpu heavy parts (only > sound generation) to csound. That might be my future solution. > > Otherwise I sometimes wish I learned supercollider in stead, since it > seems to perform better and has some nifty tricks up its sleeve. I study > supercollider in my spare time, but my live setup in chuck works and > migrating 2 hours of interactive, algoritmic music is not a quick task > however sleek the environment or how well you know it :-( > > And why don't you use puredata, with csound for example? \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
