Hartmut Noack wrote: > Grammostola Rosea schrieb: > > Scott wrote: > >> Peter Nelson wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 02:00 +0200, hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:43:32 -0700 > >>>> Scott <lau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > >> I didn't explain my purpose for using Audacity. I use it to play > MP3 files, but also > >> to change their tempo while preserving the pitch so I can learn > drum and guitar parts > >> for complicated riffs. It's excellent for this purpose. I've > tried a few other tempo > >> control apps before but they were excessively choppy. It's been a > while so if anyone > >> can recommend one that works better than Audacity these days, I'd > love to hear it. > > SND has separate sliders for pitch and speed based on granular > synthesis. Works very much OK for me - quite a bit better then to have > the thing rendered before hearing and still with acceptable sound-quality. > > >> > > Try rezound > > Rezound is just great in terms of concept and it is still the most > comfortable destructive wave-editor for Linux. But let us be honest: it > has not seen a update in years ... I was about to say this. I was attempting to compile an RPM of the latest version and found that it requires XFree86-devel as a dependency. It looks promising, but I hit my limit with regard to how much time I spend on software versus time spend playing music. Audacity will have to do. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
