andy baxter wrote: > James Cameron wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:17:30PM -1000, david wrote: >> >>> USB not sharing interrupts with anything? >>> >> >> Andy's original post contained /proc/interrupts which showed some >> sharing was happening. Here's a cut: >> >> 16: 380396 233180 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4, yenta >> 17: 829711 532117 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb5, >> ohci1394, HDA Intel >> 18: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi mmc0 >> 19: 2 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb6 >> 20: 18 17 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb1 >> 21: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb2 >> 22: 305246 302929 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb3 >> >> Sharing interrupts adds a tiny delay to interrupt handling; if this has >> truly become significant, there's a design issue somewhere else. >> >> (Shared interrupts with modern kernels are not a huge problem, since the >> drivers check to see if the interrupt they have is legitimate before the >> kernel chains on to the next driver. It's the waste of that additional >> check that people want to avoid.) >> > The usb port I'm using is on INT 21 (uhci_hcd:usb2), which doesn't share > with anything. Hmmm. Which video driver are you using (maybe you already mentioned it)? If using Intel, try VESA, or viceversa, just in case it's the video driver doing something? -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user