On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Rui Nuno Capela<rncbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, September 1, 2009 01:44, Paul Davis wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Rui Nuno Capela<rncbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> on my own confession, during lac2007 presentation, making a live clone >>> was indeed my initial goal for qtractor. it still is, as much of a >>> foundation it can be. >> >> it might be worth you knowing that the heart of live is realtime granular >> (re)synthesis, all the time, everywhere (or at least it was a while ago). >> i suspect that you cannot do what live does without this as the >> basic model of audio output. i could be wrong. >> > > by clone i was only referring to the pattern/matrix loop sequencer of the > thing, sorry, not the sampler or synth and what else that goes in the > monolith. i think, that was and probably still is imho the distinguishing > feature from the pack, giving function and merit to its own name, live. > > qtractor is and will be just a sequencer. any attempt to make it an > all-in-one-wonder will get kicked out at first sight :) Hey Rui - what about "just" having multiple timelines that can be switched on the fly (with the switching quantized to a bar)? Graphically, each timeline would be a column (tracks are still your rows). This would give you a pattern/matrix loop sequencer of sorts. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
