Atte Andre Jensen wrote: > I think an important aspect is if you see you self ready to deliver as a > one-developer company. > > Renoise is developed by a group of developers, and came from (some kind > of) opensource that got serious/commercial at one point. > > EnergyXT started as a single developer, closed source project, and has > now evolved into a company with more than one person. > > Renoise development is going well, users are happy, the application is > stable and a logical roadmap is laid out based on input from users > (including polls). > > EnergyXT development is a mess. The application is not very stable, > users are flaming the developers at the forum for not listening, and > many users are switching away. > > I bought both, so for me it's not about the money (what is 50 euros, > anyways?), but I think you'd have an easier time with an opensource > application, especially if you manage to build a development team and a > user base over time. > Thanks for your input! As this is my pet project I do want to keep complete control over development and also keeping the code as compact as possible. Keeping it closed source would secure that for me, that's really the main reason. The other (not that important) reason is that I code this in my lunchbreak (and when bored and nobody is looking) via remotedesktop. And putting in more hours is not really possible except working less and get paid for the software. If there's a opensource way around it I would do it. Still, I have given myself a year to get to a workable version and in the mean time I will decide how to release it. cheers, Robbert _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
