Re: another csound vs supercollider question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Like Dan said, it depends on what you're running, in hardware and software.
> I've used both systems in realtime, each performs very well in Linux with an
> rt-enabled kernel.

hardware - amd 64
software - the goal is to do the entire job with a single piece of
software. no gui for live acts, just hardware MIDI controllers.

> Which one you prefer really depends on other factors, e.g. language type,
> available opcodes, GUI, etc.

for me, those factors are (a) playing live with (b) algorythmic
compostion, and (c) synths/fx that no one else uses. and of course (d)
proper software must be GPL.
either csound and supercolider are (d) and powerful enough for (b) &
(c), but i'm interested if one of them performs better for (a).

well, i've been on csound for quite a long while, but heard about
supercollider too much, and finally i have to decide is it worth to
give it a try :)

-- 
sex, bike, open source!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux