Re: Regular Xruns?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:45 AM, David Baron<d_baron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have niced these processes negative. Did not help either (sound breakage
> during other IO or Xorg activity) or the xruns. Xmms (the old one) scarcely
> breaks at all at nice 0.

David - not picking on you in any way, just want to get the message
out there even more clearly: nice(1) has absolutely nothing useful to
offer any issues connected with scheduling processes to meet
hardware-determined deadlines (ie. your audio interface). People need
to get rid of this idea. Its not just "not the best way", its
completely irrelevant.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux