On Tuesday 04 August 2009 19:11:53 you wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:52 AM, > eviltwin69@xxxxxxxxxxxx<eviltwin69@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue Aug 4 14:09 , Arnold Krille sent: > >>On Tuesday 04 August 2009 12:36:40 Jan Depner wrote: > >>> There really isn't much we can add to it. In fact, I think we probably > >>> want to remove a couple of things ;-) > >>For example that 10ms delay so it gets (more) usable for live-foh usage? > >> ;-) > > Unfortunately, I don't think there's any hope for that. That's just > > processing overhead. I was thinking more of the per band delays. I > > added those, mostly just for fun and to learn how the processing worked. > > They make a minor difference in the output but not enough to warrant > > keeping them. I talked to the main-devs (was it steve harris) one or several times. As far as I remember the 10ms delay is because of the math in either the EQ or the X- over for the compressors, don't remember exactly which. And there is probably no way to cirumvent that. Hmm, maybe DSP-expert Fons has something in his toolbox? > Just my personal POV, and not that it can't be used live, but the > concept of using Jamin 'live' really wasn't what the original purpose > was which was more a mastering plugin to address what we were missing > from the Waves stuff as we came to Linux. Well, I have seen people use a three-band studio compressor from the mastering-rack on tour for foh. And everyone uses a 31band EQ live (or at least should). So I actually tried to use jamin as master-effect once. Worked okay from the sound-perspective but the musicians and speakers complained about the delay (was a rather small room). > Jamin's been a great too for me as it is. For me too! But that doesn't let me stop dreaming. :-) Have fun, Arnold
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
