Re: PHASEX-0.12.0-beta3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Norval Watson wrote:

> Hi William,
> I was compiling this Phasex on a stable 32-bit debian partition and make failed thus:
>
> checking for GTK... yes
> checking for ALSA.... no
> configure: error: need ALSA >= 0.9.x
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> but my alsa pkgs are as follows
>
> norv@stable32:~/PHASEX/phasex-0.12.0$ dpkg -l alsa-base
> ii  alsa-base      1.0.17.dfsg-4  ALSA driver configuration files
> norv@stable32:~/PHASEX/phasex-0.12.0$ dpkg -l alsa-utils
> ii  alsa-utils     1.0.16-2       ALSA utilities
>
> have I done something stupid?
> Phasex is going great on another unstable 64bit partition, same machine..
> Thanks again for Phasex!
> Norv

Hello Norv,

Are you, by chance, building out of the same directory used for the 
64-bit build?  In either case, let's see if rebuilding aclocal.m4 
and configure do the trick:

make distclean
aclocal
autoconf
automake
autoheader
./configure --enable-arch=your_cpu_here
make

It's been a while since I've been on a debian box.  Anyone else on 
the list get a successful build for debian 32-bit stable?  If so, 
did you have to jump through any extra hoops?


Cheers,
--ww
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux