Mark Knecht wrote: > Is that arch, as in Arch Linux, and not arch as in ~arch on Gentoo? That would be arch linux. > read your web page and feel disappointed that the Gentoo install still > either frustrates or scares off so many people I not the more hard-core linux user around, but I would say above average :-) And I can tell you I went after gentoo with and open mind and time on my hands and still couldn't make that first boot. I might have simply lost my way, and overlooked to obvious/simple/actual path, but then that's what I did. > but it sounds like you > made a good decision. I hear good things about Arch. It seems to be working out very well. A bit (or quite a bit, depending on how you look at it) of hand-config and per-package install, but it's a quite simple distro, very straight-ahead and seems very responsive and up-to-date. -- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk http://virb.com/atte _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
